Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:20

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

SpaceX marks 500th Falcon launch with Starlink 11-22 Mission - Teslarati

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

What’s next?

Samsung closed the One UI 8 beta to new users in the US after barely a day - 9to5Google

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Thank you.

Do you suck dicks with no reciprocation?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

U.S. stock futures dip ahead of renewed trade talks with China - MarketWatch

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Trump is forcing this dirty, costly coal plant to stay open - The Washington Post

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Corrupti corporis sit reprehenderit facilis nam.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Roster rankings: PFF gives an ugly grade to the Browns roster - Dawgs By Nature

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What’s Behind PayPal’s Will Ferrell Ads? - WSJ

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Dakota Johnson Raves About Working With First Intimacy Coordinator: “It’s Not Sexy” - Deadline